Traditional self-defence systems vs. modern combat sports, what is better?
I will answer the question in few seconds.
First of all, I can hear all the so called “traditionalists” with their arsenal of deadly techniques and excuses of not being able to use them in a sport enviroment.
Of course our art was never designed for a fair-play sport environment, but make no mistake – full contact sparring (and various forms of it) with protective gear is the bread and butter of combat training, regardless of what you train. Gloves, mouthpiece, cup – be happy to have them. Old timers would have use them as well if they could.
But – sport version of the fullcontact sparring is not the whole picture either. Let’s consider the eye poke or groin kick: totally unacceptable in a sport environment, of course. MMA is today legitimate sport and I am personaly a huge MMA fan. Sport means rules and fair play game, period.
Reality based self-defense, like all the traditional martial arts? Different story. Groin kick or eye poke of course does not necessarily stop the fight – the storm that follows after does the job. Try 2 on 1 „sparring“, and the game changes, totally. Multiple opponents vs. 1? Or give one guy a training knife – again, whole different world.
So, how about all the so called “dirty techniques”, as Chinese say, “Poisonous Hands” (Duk Sau)? Yes, train them, A LOT (and there are safe ways how to do it), but make sure that they are not a substitution for full power, full aggression combat training, not to mention solid athletic base (strength, power, cardio).
So, “what is better – traditional self-defense systems, or the modern combat sports?
The answer is “yes”.
Pavel Macek Sifu, Practical Hung Kyun
If you like the article and if you want to support our work, please add your comment, click “tweet” or “like”. Your support will help us and encourage us to publish and share more articles and videos in the future!
Thank you for every visit, “tweet”, “like” or comment!
No upcoming events